Imams from Novosibirsk turn to ECHR
Настоящий материал (информация) произведен и (или) распространен иностранным агентом РОО Центр «Сова» либо касается деятельности иностранного агента РОО Центр «Сова».
Merazhov and Kamil Odilov have appealed to the European Court of Human Rights.
On January 14th,
two imams from Novosibirsk, Ilkhom Merzhov and Kamil Odilov, turned to the
European Court of Human Rights to appeal their sentence received in 2013.
In their appeal Merzhov and
Odilov indicated that their rights, guaranteed by the European Convention For
the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ,had been violated during
the court proceedings brought against them under part 1 of article 282.2 of the
Russian Criminal Code (organizing activities for an extremist organization) on
the accusation that they had continued activities for the banned religious
association “Nurdzhular”. Specifically, the following rights had been violated:
– Right to a fair trial;
– No punishment without law: the imams were convicted for their participation
in the activities of a non-existent religious association, and also because of
an abundance of non-legal terminology in the sentence;
– Right to respect for private and family life, and also article 1 of protocol
1 (on protection of property): the accused had been subject to searches in
which their personal effects had been seized, were not returned to them, and
some were destroyed;
– Freedom of thought, conscience and religion: the prosecution, sentence, and appellate
court decision regarding Merazhov and Odilov restrict these freedoms, and the
court decision destroying their books and commentaries on the Koran, which
contain quotes from texts holy to Muslims, offends their religious
10 – Freedom of expression: Merazhov and Odilov were condemned for reading and
discussing the books of Said Nursi, interpreted by the court as organizing
activities for “Nurdzhular”;
11 – Freedom of assembly and association: the court sentence restricts the
rights of the imams in regard to freedom of peaceful assembly in a private
13 – Right to an effective remedy: Merazhov’s application for a judicial review
of Nurdzhular’s actual existence was denied by the Russian Supreme Court;
14 – Prohibition of discrimination: the imams maintain that they were subject
to prosecution under article 282.2 precisely because they are Islamic clerics.
The imams had been convicted
of organizing activities of the religious association “Nurdzhular” while
knowing that it is banned as an extremist organization.
The only reason for
prosecuting Merazhov and Odilov is the fact that they studied books written by
the Turkish theologian Said Nursi. We consider neither the banning of the books
nor the banning of “Nurdzhular” to be legitimate, an organization which in any
case does not exist in Russia: separate individuals encounter groundless
prosecution for studying Nursi’s books.
Translated by Matthew McDonald
Page generated 02.04.2023 at 03:14